Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Does smoking status affect the likelihood of consulting a doctor about respiratory symptoms? A pilot survey in Western Australia

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Jun 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christine Bond
22 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Cleland
1 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anders Ostrem
5 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Noel O'Kelly
10 Nov 2008 Author responded Author comments - Moyez Jiwa
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Nov 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Nov 2008 Author responded Author comments - Moyez Jiwa
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Nov 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Cleland
18 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christine Bond
2 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Noel O'Kelly
11 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Moyez Jiwa
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
17 Feb 2009 Editorially accepted
17 Feb 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-10-16

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement