Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: General practitioners and tutors' experiences with peer group academic detailing: a qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Oct 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samuel Coenen
18 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Theo Verheij
22 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Attila Altiner
22 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jan C. Frich
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samuel Coenen
19 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Attila Altiner
24 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jan C. Frich
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jan C. Frich
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
12 Feb 2010 Editorially accepted
12 Feb 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-11-12

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement