Open Peer Review Reports for: The implementation evaluation of primary care groups of practice: a focus on organizational identity
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 7 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Glenn Robert |
| 9 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Grant Russell |
| 15 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Charo Rodriguez |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 15 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 18 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Grant Russell |
| 28 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Charo Rodriguez |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 28 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 22 Feb 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 22 Feb 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-11-15 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
