Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A study of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-9 in primary care elderly

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Dec 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Hankins
22 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kurt Kroenke
8 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth Phelan
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth Phelan
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth Phelan
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
25 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth Phelan
Resubmission - Version 7
25 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
1 Sep 2010 Editorially accepted
1 Sep 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-11-63

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement