Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Gender bias revisited: new insights on the differential management of chest pain

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Jun 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Bösner
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Purdy
9 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cheryl Carmin
11 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giorgio Bedogni
4 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Bösner
Resubmission - Version 3
4 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giorgio Bedogni
17 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Purdy
24 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Bösner
Resubmission - Version 4
24 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Bösner
Resubmission - Version 5
30 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
1 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Bösner
Resubmission - Version 6
1 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
3 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Bösner
Resubmission - Version 8
3 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
6 Jun 2011 Editorially accepted
6 Jun 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-12-45

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement