Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Coding of procedures documented by general practitioners in Swedish primary care-an explorative study using two procedure coding systems

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 May 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Colin Simpson
25 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bernard Fernando
27 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zoe Morrison
17 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Anna Vikström
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Colin Simpson
29 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bernard Fernando
2 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zoe Morrison
22 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Anna Vikström
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Anna Vikström
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
9 Jan 2012 Editorially accepted
9 Jan 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-13-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement