Open Peer Review Reports for: When the group practice breaks up: a qualitative study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 13 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Laurent Letrilliart |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 13 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 3 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martine Granek-Catarivas |
| 13 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Armstrong |
| 20 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Laurent Letrilliart |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 20 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 2 May 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 May 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-14-53 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
