What makes up good consultations? A qualitative study of GPs’ discourses
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 Feb 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lewis Kirshner|
|21 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan DE LEPELEIRE|
|22 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan De Mol|
|16 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Kaatje Van Roy|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan DE LEPELEIRE|
|22 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lewis Kirshner|
|26 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan De Mol|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 May 2013||Editorially accepted|
|16 May 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-14-62|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.