Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: What makes up good consultations? A qualitative study of GPs’ discourses

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Feb 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lewis Kirshner
21 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan DE LEPELEIRE
22 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan De Mol
16 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Kaatje Van Roy
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan DE LEPELEIRE
22 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lewis Kirshner
26 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan De Mol
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
7 May 2013 Editorially accepted
16 May 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-14-62

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement