Open Peer Review Reports for: The use of tetanus post-exposure prophylaxis guidelines by general practitioners and emergency departments in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional questionnaire study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Jan 2014 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 26 Feb 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joke Korevaar |
| 26 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Freitag |
| 30 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Guido Schmiemann |
| 15 May 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Robine Donken |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 15 May 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 22 May 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Robine Donken |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 22 May 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 2 Jun 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Robine Donken |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 2 Jun 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 3 Jun 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 9 Jun 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-15-112 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
