Open Peer Review Reports for: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in primary care: an observational pilot study of seven generic instruments
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 8 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sarah Knowles |
| 18 Dec 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Foteini Anastasiou |
| 21 Jan 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan-Willem Weenink |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Jan 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 27 Feb 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan-Willem Weenink |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 27 Feb 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 22 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Foteini Anastasiou |
| 31 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sarah Knowles |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 17 Apr 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 May 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-15-88 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
