Open Peer Review Reports for: Diagnosis of depression among adolescents – a clinical validation study of key questions and questionnaire
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Feb 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 29 Jun 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Ole Rikard Haavet |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 29 Jun 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 12 Jul 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Ole Rikard Haavet |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 12 Jul 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 13 Jul 2007 | Editorially accepted | |
| 13 Jul 2007 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-8-41 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
