Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Exploring men's and women's experiences of depression and engagement with health professionals: more similarities than differences? A qualitative interview study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Dec 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Jan 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christopher Kilmartin
26 Jan 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Suzanne Brownhill
15 Feb 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Elizabeth Rogers
17 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - Carol Emslie
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christopher Kilmartin
13 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Elizabeth Rogers
23 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Suzanne Brownhill
27 Jun 2007 Author responded Author comments - Carol Emslie
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Jun 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Jul 2007 Author responded Author comments - Carol Emslie
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Jul 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
24 Jul 2007 Editorially accepted
24 Jul 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-8-43

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement