Open Peer Review Reports for: Improving primary palliative care in Scotland: lessons from a mixed methods study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2015 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 25 Sep 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hakan Yaman |
| 26 Oct 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Donata Kurpas |
| 3 Nov 2015 | Author responded | Author comments - Bruce Mason |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 3 Nov 2015 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 23 Nov 2015 | Author responded | Author comments - Bruce Mason |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 23 Nov 2015 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 1 Dec 2015 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 Dec 2015 | Article published | 10.1186/s12875-015-0391-x |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
