Skip to main content

Table 2 Reasons for not advising specific vaccinations despite STIKO-recommendation and in the absence of any contraindication (multiple answers possible)

From: Advising vaccinations for the elderly: a cross-sectional survey on differences between general practitioners and physician assistants in Germany

 

Totala (n = 1230)

General practitioners (n = 774)

Physician assistantsa (n = 456)

 

Tetanus (n = 90)

Influenza (n = 141)

Pneumococcal (n = 183)

Tetanus (i = 76)

Influenza (n = 113)

Pneumococcal (n = 148)

Tetanus (n = 14)

Influenza (n = 28)

Pneumococcal (n = 35)

 

No. (%)

No. (%)

No. (%)

No. (%)

No (%)

No (%)

No. (%)

No (%)

No. (%)

Disease is harmless

0

4 (2.8)

3 (1.6)

0

2 (1.8)

2 (1.4)

0

2 (7.1)

1 (2.9)

Forgot to advise

65 (72.2)

74 (52.5)

129 (70.5)

56 (73.7)

60 (53.1)

107 (72.3)

9 (64.3)

14 (50.0)

22 (62.9)

Vaccine is ineffective

2 (2.2)

21 (14.9)

9 (4.9)

2 (2.6)

19 (16.8)

9 (6.1)

0

2 (7.1)

0

Does not feel responsible for vaccinations

7 (7.8)

3 (2.1)

4 (2.2)

5 (6.6)

0

0

2 (14.3)

3 (10.7)

4 (11.4)

Vaccine is not safe

1 (1.1)

19 (13.5)

12 (6.6)

1 (1.3)

13 (11.5)

10 (6.8)

0

6 (21.4)

2 (5.7)

Was not aware of recommendation

5 (5.6)

2 (1.4)

4 (2.2)

5 (6.6)

2 (1.8)

2 (1.4)

0

0

2 (5.7)

Risk of the patient to catch disease is low

21 (23.3)

38 (27.0)

51 (27.9)

18 (23.7)

33 (29.2)

43 (29.1)

3 (21.4)

5 (17.9)

8 (22.9)

Accounting is too complicated

3 (3.3)

3 (2.1)

3 (1.6)

1 (1.3)

1 (0.9)

1 (0.7)

2 (14.3)

2 (7.1)

2 (5.7)

Reimbursement does not compensate the effort

8 (8.9)

11 (7.8)

9 (4.9)

4 (5.3)

7 (6.2)

4 (2.7)

4 (28.6)

4 (14.3)

5 (14.3)

  1. aOnly Physician Assistants included that stated to be (partly) responsible for vaccination advises in their practice