Open Peer Review Reports for: Feasibility of an implementation strategy for the integration of health promotion in routine primary care: a quantitative process evaluation
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 Apr 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 15 Jun 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Alvaro Sanchez |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 15 Jun 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 11 Jul 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Danny Hills |
| 14 Aug 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paula Brauer |
| 30 Sep 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Alvaro Sanchez |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 30 Sep 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 14 Nov 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Alvaro Sanchez |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 14 Nov 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 20 Dec 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Alvaro Sanchez |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 20 Dec 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 19 Jan 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 17 Feb 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12875-017-0585-5 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
