Open Peer Review Reports for: What gives rise to clinician gut feeling, its influence on management decisions and its prognostic value for children with RTI in primary care: a prospective cohort study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
5 Apr 2017 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
22 Apr 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ann Van Den Bruel |
1 May 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Medlicott |
2 May 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nikki Turner |
25 Sep 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Sophie Louise Turnbull |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
25 Sep 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 Oct 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Sophie Louise Turnbull |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
24 Oct 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Publishing | ||
24 Jan 2018 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Feb 2018 | Article published | 10.1186/s12875-018-0716-7 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.