Skip to main content

Table 6 Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios comparing enhanced to traditional fee-for-service produced from the cervical cancer screening model

From: Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada

 

Year

Unadjusted

Adjusted for Patient Characteristics

Adjusted for Patient and Physician Characteristics

Odds Ratio

95% CI

p-value

Odds Ratio

95% CI

p-value

Odds Ratio

95% CI

p-value

Income Q1 (lowest)

 Enhanced vs. traditional fee-for-service

2005

0.97

(0.96–0.99)

0.000

0.96

(0.95–0.98)

<.0001

0.98

(0.97–1.00)

0.0231

2006

0.99

(0.98–1.00)

0.080

0.98

(0.96–0.99)

0.0008

1.00

(0.99–1.02)

0.7417

2007

1.03

(1.01–1.05)

0.004

1.02

(1.00–1.04)

0.0271

1.06

(1.04–1.08)

<.0001

2008

0.98

(0.96–1.01)

0.145

0.99

(0.97–1.0)

0.649

1.04

(1.02–1.07)

0.001

2009

1.10

(1.07–1.14)

<.0001

1.14

(1.10–1.17)

<.0001

1.16

(1.13–1.20)

<.0001

2010

1.04

(1.00–1.08)

0.028

1.10

(1.06–1.14)

<.0001

1.16

(1.11–1.20)

<.0001

2011

1.04

(1.00–1.09)

0.082

1.09

(1.04–1.15)

0.0004

1.19

(1.31–1.25)

<.0001

2012

1.08

(1.02–1.14)

0.006

1.21

(1.14–1.28)

<.0001

1.20

(1.13–1.27)

<.0001

Income Q5 (highest)

 Enhanced vs. traditional fee-for-service

2005

1.06

(1.04–1.07)

<.0001

1.07

(1.05–1.09)

<.0001

1.06

(1.05–1.08)

<.0001

2006

1.04

(1.03–1.06)

<.0001

1.06

(1.05–1.08)

<.0001

1.09

(1.08–1.11)

<.0001

2007

1.15

(1.13–1.18)

<.0001

1.18

(1.15–1.21)

<.0001

1.20

(1.17–1.23)

<.0001

2008

1.15

(1.12–1.19)

<.0001

1.20

(1.17–1.24)

<.0001

1.26

(1.22–1.30)

<.0001

2009

1.18

(1.14–1.22)

<.0001

1.24

(1.20–1.29)

<.0001

1.24

(1.20–1.29)

<.0001

2010

1.26

(1.20–1.32)

<.0001

1.35

(1.29–1.42)

<.0001

1.38

(1.31–1.44)

<.0001

2011

1.21

(1.15–1.29)

<.0001

1.33

(1.25–1.41)

<.0001

1.37

(1.29–1.45)

<.0001

2012

1.17

(1.10–1.25)

<.0001

1.33

(1.24–1.42)

<.0001

1.31

(1.23–1.41)

<.0001

Ratios of Odds Ratios

 Difference in enhanced vs. traditional fee-for-service between Q1 vs. Q5

2005

0.92

(0.90–0.94)

<.0001

0.90

(0.88–0.92)

<.0001

0.92

(0.90–0.95)

<.0001

2006

0.95

(0.93–0.97)

<.0001

0.92

(0.90–0.94)

<.0001

0.92

(0.90–0.94)

<.0001

2007

0.89

(0.87–0.92)

<.0001

0.87

(0.84–0.89)

<.0001

0.88

(0.86–0.909)

<.0001

2008

0.85

(0.82–0.89)

<.0001

0.83

(0.79–0.86)

<.0001

0.83

(0.80–0.86)

<.0001

2009

0.94

(0.90–0.98)

0.007

0.92

(0.87–0.96)

0.000

0.94

(0.89–0.98)

0.0059

2010

0.83

(0.78–0.88)

<.0001

0.81

(0.76–0.86)

<.0001

0.84

(0.79–0.89)

<.0001

2011

0.86

(0.80–0.92)

<.0001

0.82

(0.76–0.89)

<.0001

0.87

(0.81–0.94)

0.0003

2012

0.92

(0.85–1.01)

0.064

0.91

(0.84–0.99)

0.032

0.91

(0.83–0.99)

0.0353

  1. Results for Q2-Q4 not shown. Ratios of odds ratios are also presented, with Q5 and traditional fee-for-service serving as referent groups