Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Development of the Japanese version of the general practice assessment questionnaire: measurement of patient experience and testing of data quality

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Jun 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Donata Kurpas
10 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Edwards
10 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Tsunetaka Kijima
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Weng Yee Chin
4 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Dewhurst
30 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Tsunetaka Kijima
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Tsunetaka Kijima
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
16 Nov 2018 Editorially accepted
28 Nov 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12875-018-0873-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement