Skip to main content

Table 5 Evaluation of PVS-PREDIAPS discrete implementation strategies as cataloged by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy

From: Fidelity evaluation of the compared procedures for conducting the PVS-PREDIAPS implementation strategy to optimize diabetes prevention in primary care

Strategies in italics were those identified a priori to be used as part of implementation plan

(X) Implementation strategy identified as useful for own professional development

(+) Implementation strategy considered valuable for the optimization process

(B) Implementation strategy needed to foster competence building

(E) Implementation strategy needed to facilitate engagement of professionals

(C) Implementation strategy needed for inter-professional collaboration

(−) Implementation strategy identified as needing improvement

 

Global group

Sequential group

PREDIAPS-ERIC Strategies

PC1 A

PC2 Zu

PC3 Iz

PC4 P

PC5 Er

PC6 Sv

PC7 Eg

PC Za

PC So

Pre-planned ERIC Strategies

 5. Audit and provide feedback

+

 

X -

 

B

X +

 

X

+

 12. Change record systems

         

 14. Conduct cyclical small tests of change

X +

+

       

 15. Conduct educational meetings

X +

X -

X +

X -

X

X ++ −

X +

X

X - B

 17. Conduct local consensus discussions

         

 18. Conduct local needs assessment

  

X

    

X

X

 19. Conduct on-going training

         

 23. Develop a formal implementation blueprint

         

 27. Develop and organize quality monitoring systems

         

 48. Organize clinician implementation team meetings

         

 51. Promote adaptability

       

+

 

 55. On-going support for implementation

         

 57. Recruit, designate, train for leadership

E

      

C

 

 59. Revise professional roles

C

        

Additional ERIC Strategies Perceived

 20. Create a learning collaborative

 

X

+

XX +

X

 

+

X

X +

 33. Facilitation

X

+

 

+

 

X +

   

 44. Mandate change

E

E

  

B