Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline prescribing family physician characteristics by patients’ location of dwelling

From: The relationship between relational continuity and family physician follow-up after an antidepressant prescription in older adults: a retrospective cohort study

Characteristic

Urban

Non-major urban

Rural

Missing

Total

Standardized difference: non-major urban vs. Urban

Standardized difference: Rural vs. Urban

Standardized difference: Missing vs. Urban

N = 161,912

N = 63,001

N = 22,150

N = 1,299

N = 248,362

   

Patient panel size

        

Mean ± SD

1,597.25 ± 812.19

1,578.68 ± 769.36

1,280.39 ± 678.41

1,263.10 ± 744.45

1,562.53 ± 795.32

0.023

0.423

0.429

Median (IQR)

1,539 (1,082 − 2,032)

1,526 (1,123-1,966)

1,232 (868-1,659)

1,199 (760-1,661)

1,500 (1,066 − 1,987)

  

Physician age

        

Mean ± SD

52.91 ± 12.08

51.88 ± 11.96

51.78 ± 12.22

52.14 ± 11.62

52.54 ± 12.07

0.085

0.093

0.065

Median (IQR)

54 (44–62)

53 (43–61)

53 (42–61)

53 (43–61)

53 (44–62)

   

Physician sex

        

Female

64,747 (40.0%)

23,140 (36.7%)

8,453 (38.2%)

460 (35.4%)

96,800 (39.0%)

0.067

0.037

0.095

Male

97,165 (60.0%)

39,861 (63.3%)

13,697 (61.8%)

839 (64.6%)

151,562 (61.0%)

0.067

0.037

0.095

Years since graduation

        

<=15

35,249 (21.8%)

16,404 (26.0%)

6,321 (28.5%)

335 (25.8%)

58,309 (23.5%)

0.100

0.156

0.095

16–25

35,513 (21.9%)

13,533 (21.5%)

4,187 (18.9%)

250 (19.2%)

53,483 (21.5%)

0.011

0.075

0.067

26–35

47,752 (29.5%)

18,622 (29.6%)

6,747 (30.5%)

409 (31.5%)

73,530 (29.6%)

0.001

0.021

0.043

36+

43,360 (26.8%)

14,431 (22.9%)

4,892 (22.1%)

305 (23.5%)

62,988 (25.4%)

0.090

0.109

0.076

missing

38 (0.0%)

11 (0.0%)

<=5 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

52 (0.0%)

0.004

0.007

0.022

Practice location

        

Urban

143,528 (88.6%)

13,895 (22.1%)

2,494 (11.3%)

343 (26.4%)

160,260 (64.5%)

1.804

2.444

1.621

Non-major urban

6,269 (3.9%)

41,376 (65.7%)

4,794 (21.6%)

348 (26.8%)

52,787 (21.3%)

1.705

0.553

0.671

Rural

995 (0.6%)

2,783 (4.4%)

12,497 (56.4%)

443 (34.1%)

16,718 (6.7%)

0.245

1.572

0.986

Missing

11,119 (6.9%)

4,947 (7.9%)

2,365 (10.7%)

165 (12.7%)

18,596 (7.5%)

0.038

0.135

0.197

Payment model*

        

Blended capitation

61,666 (38.1%)

18,992 (30.1%)

4,675 (21.1%)

217 (16.7%)

85,550 (34.4%)

0.168

0.379

0.494

Comprehensive Care Model

5,100 (3.1%)

2,087 (3.3%)

892 (4.0%)

37 (2.8%)

8,116 (3.3%)

0.009

0.047

0.018

Family Health Group

44,561 (27.5%)

6,701 (10.6%)

1,723 (7.8%)

153 (11.8%)

53,138 (21.4%)

0.440

0.536

0.404

Family Health Team

35,634 (22.0%)

29,384 (46.6%)

11,830 (53.4%)

521 (40.1%)

77,369 (31.2%)

0.537

0.685

0.399

Non-group physician

14,748 (9.1%)

4,234 (6.7%)

2,399 (10.8%)

189 (14.5%)

21,570 (8.7%)

0.089

0.058

0.169

Other

202 (0.1%)

1,603 (2.5%)

631 (2.8%)

182 (14.0%)

2,618 (1.1%)

0.212

0.227

0.563

Full-time (Full-time equivalent > = 1.00)

126,652 (78.2%)

48,824 (77.5%)

15,088 (68.1%)

775 (59.7%)

191,339 (77.0%)

0.017

0.230

0.409

  1. * Family physicians in Ontario receive a variety of payment models. We have grouped Family Health Organizations and Family Health Networks into “Blended capitation”. The Comprehensive Care Model and Family Health Group are fee-for-service models enhanced with bonuses and premiums and a small capitation fee. Family Health Teams are an interdisciplinary team model where most family physicians receive blended capitation, but also receive funding for other health professionals. Non-group physicians are not part of a physician group, and mostly receive fee-for-service payment. “Other” payment models are mostly one-off payment models focused on target patient-populations. More information about Ontario’s family physician payment models can be found here: https://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/pcpm/